Current:Home > ContactHow did each Supreme Court justice vote in today's student loan forgiveness ruling? Here's a breakdown -FinanceCore
How did each Supreme Court justice vote in today's student loan forgiveness ruling? Here's a breakdown
View
Date:2025-04-15 20:08:58
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 that the Biden administration does not have the authority to wipe out nearly half-a-trillion dollars in student debt.
The decision denies relief to about 40 million Americans who stood to have up to $20,000 in student debt erased by the plan using the HEROES Act.
There were actually two student loan forgiveness decisions made on Friday: The first was about whether two private citizens had the right to challenge the plan. The court unanimously said that the pair did not have standing, and their challenge was thrown out.
- Read the full text of the decision
However, in the case where the decision to strike down the forgiveness plan was made, the court said that Missouri — one of six states that challenged the plan — did have legal standing. This allowed the court to consider whether the secretary of education could use the HEROES Act to forgive student loan debt.
Here's how the court voted on that case.
Supreme Court justices who voted against student loan forgiveness
The Supreme Court's decision fell along ideological lines, much like Thursday's decision to end race-based affirmative action.
Chief Justice John Roberts voted against the student loan forgiveness plan and delivered the majority opinion, saying that U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona has the authority to "waive or modify" the HEROES Act, but not "rewrite that statute from the ground up."
"The Secretary's comprehensive debt cancellation plan cannot fairly be called a waiver—it not only nullifies existing provisions, but augments and expands them dramatically. It cannot be mere modification, because it constitutes 'effectively the introduction of a whole new regime,'" Roberts wrote.
Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted with Roberts.
Barrett filed a concurring opinion, writing that the court "can uphold the Secretary of Education's loan cancellation program only if he points to 'clear congressional authorization' for it."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold student loan forgiveness
The court's three liberal voices — Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson — all opposed the decision. Kagan filed a dissent where she called the decision to take up the case, let alone vote on it, an "overreach."
"The plaintiffs in this case are six States that have no personal stake in the Secretary's loan forgiveness plan," Kagan wrote. "They are classic ideological plaintiffs: They think the plan a very bad idea, but they are no worse off because the Secretary differs. In giving those States a forum — in adjudicating their complaint — the Court forgets its proper role. The Court acts as though it is an arbiter of political and policy disputes, rather than of cases and controversies."
In the dissent, Kagan wrote that Cardona acted within the "broad authority" provided by the HEROES Act, saying that the decision to alter usual rules "fits comfortably within" the parameters set by the statute.
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Clarence Thomas
- Student Debt
- Student Loan
- Student Loans
- Ketanji Brown Jackson
- Miguel Cardona
- John Roberts
Kerry Breen is a news editor and reporter for CBS News. Her reporting focuses on current events, breaking news and substance use.
veryGood! (2327)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Duke, a 'boring' Las Vegas dog returned for napping too much, has new foster home
- Confrontational. Defensive. Unnecessary. Deion Sanders' act is wearing thin.
- Which cars won't make it to 2025? Roundup of discontinued models
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Californians: Your rent may go up because of rising insurance rates
- Victor Wembanyama warns opponents ‘everywhere’ after gold medal loss to USA
- An ex-Kansas police chief who led a raid on a newspaper is charged with obstruction of justice
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Blink Fitness gym chain files for bankruptcy, here's what it means for locations around US
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- What vitamins should you take? Why experts say some answers to this are a 'big red flag.'
- Ex-Cornell student sentenced to 21 months for making antisemitic threats
- Katie Holmes Makes Rare Comments on Bond With 18-Year-Old Daughter Suri
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Truth Social reports $16M in Q2 losses, less than $1M in revenue; DJT stock falls 7%
- Paige DeSorbo Shares Surprising Update on Filming Summer House With Pregnant Lindsay Hubbard & Carl Radke
- Gwen Stefani cancels Atlantic City concert due to unspecified 'injury'
Recommendation
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
Former Cornell student gets 21 months in prison for posting violent threats to Jewish students
Vince Vaughn makes rare appearance with children at Hollywood Walk of Fame ceremony
What is compassion fatigue? Experts say taking care of others can hurt your mental health.
Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
A jury says a Louisiana regulator is not liable for retirees’ $400 million in Stanford Ponzi losses
Watch as mischievous bear breaks into classroom and nearly steals the teacher's lunch
A jury says a Louisiana regulator is not liable for retirees’ $400 million in Stanford Ponzi losses